![structorizer always in french structorizer always in french](https://cdn.thecoolist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/French-Crop-classic-mens-hairstyle-1-e1495669880549-960x789.jpg)
Since version 3.29-12 you can place a central ini file with selectively exported preferences in the installation directory of Structorizer. Is it possible to ensure some "classroom" settings for Structorizer, i.e. The export may also be done as batch job at the command line having saved the group as an arrangement file before. Simply put all subroutine diagrams (and possibly needed includables) into a common arrangement group, select the group in the Arranger index and start the export via the context menu of the Arranger index. Yes, since version 3.30-07 you may use the so called group export for it. Is it possible to export a library of routines even if some of them are not called by another? Possibly there will be some updates at least to enable it to load all nsd files again, but still with very poor display options. In fact we think it does not make much sense to develop algorithms on a smartphone. So it may just be used as a viewer for simple diagrams.
#Structorizer always in french android
The Android app has not kept pace with the desktop version development since about 2007. It is not even possible to load all nsd files created by recent Desktop versions (in particular if the diagram contains TRY elements), leave allone arrangement files.
![structorizer always in french structorizer always in french](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-20QERfJltno/UOyzanmvpCI/AAAAAAAAFQM/cD9RT7GRwW4/s1600/402381_364154060281109_675515698_n.jpg)
![structorizer always in french structorizer always in french](https://s4.scoopwhoop.com/anj/sw/c4612f5e-b7c8-48dd-a1ac-94470bff37c3.jpg)
No, unfortunately, the Android app is not only reduced to very rudimentary diagram editing without any additional features, display modes etc. Is the Android app functionally compatible with the Desktop version? You can find a more detailed discussion here: Issue #830 On execution, import, and export Structorizer manages very well to ensure algorithmic equivalence. It should not be a big issue to negate the condition in order to achieve the opposite effect if desired. For avoiding ambiguity, Structorizer can only provide one of them. The only difference to a "do while" loop is the inverse logic of the loop condition. In fact, Structorizer provides an end-controlled loop with "repeat until" semantics. Is there a loop element with "do while" semantics as in C etc.? Usermanual for Structorizer 1.x & 2.x (by David Morais).Usermanual for Structorizer 3.x (by David Morais).Quick start guide for Structorizer (by Praveen Kumar).Several people have worked on this before.
#Structorizer always in french manual
Is there any user manual for Structorizer? Likewise, when you load diagrams Structorizer will adapt them to the current keyword set (if you allowed this refactoring in the import options for NSD files, reachable via menu item "Preferences"->"Import" it is enabled by default). to replace the previously valid keywords in the texts by the new ones). Whenever you modify the parser preferences, Structorizer will offer you automatically to refactor all open diagrams accordingly (i.e. Note that you may even choose among some pre-configured localized keyword sets via the broad button near the lower right corner of the Parser Preferences panel. One might expect that a typical FOR loop in C syntax looks like this: for (int i = 0 i "Parser" and change the keywords according to your needs.
![structorizer always in french structorizer always in french](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AcMnd2ursHY/maxresdefault.jpg)
Though this syntax - once very unusual when C was designed - has become pretty popular since many C-inspired other languages have adopted it, the disadvantages caused by it concerning language-independence and predictability e.g. Why doesn't Structorizer support FOR loops in C-like syntax, i.e.